MPLS vs. Ethernet for the WAN
Cost | MPLS typically costs more than Ethernet but less than T1 lines. | Ethernet is typically more affordable than MPLS. |
Scalability | MPLS can scale to over thousands of sites. | Ethernet can scale to up to hundreds of sites. |
Common applications | MPLS is best and most widely used to interconnect data centers with branch offices and branches to other branches. | Ethernet is best for interconnecting data centers. |
WAN routing | MPLS allows businesses to leave WAN routing to the service provider and keep fewer WAN engineers on staff. | Ethernet gives WAN engineers control and responsibility over routing. |
WAN protocol behavior | MPLS can handle any-to-any connectivity, including voice and video. | Ethernet offers low-latency and high-throughput, which is ideal for disaster recovery. |
Quality of service | MPLS has quality of service (QoS) options to enable preferential treatment of latency-sensitive traffic like VoIP. | Network engineers can bypass QoS complexity by hooking switches directly to Ethernet pipes. |
Service level agreements | MPLS services come with service-level agreements (SLAs) that include delivery guarantees, unlike consumer broadband. | IT professionals should either ask for an SLA for their Ethernet service or take WAN application delivery into their own hands. |
WAN management | Using MPLS for WAN connectivity requires that all network devices and management tools be compatible with both MPLS and Ethernet. | Because LANs use Ethernet, using Ethernet for the WAN gives organizations an all-Ethernet infrastructure, which simplifies network management. |
Availability | Many service providers offer MPLS services in some metropolitan areas, but not everywhere. | Ethernet exchanges have made Ethernet WAN services available in more locations. |
Read the full article over at Tech Target here.
Comments
Post a Comment